Non-restricted Winter 2026 convocation theses and dissertations are available in ERA. Congratulations to all our graduates!

[Review of the book Common Sense: a Contemporary Defense, by Nemos]

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Citation for Previous Publication

Schmitter, A.M. (2005). [Review of the book Common Sense: a Contemporary Defense, by N. Lemos]. Philosophy in Review, 25(6), 416-418.

Link to Related Item

https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/pir/issue/view/379

Abstract

Description

Introduction: Gone are the days when walking off a cliff, living in a bathtub, or inventing a new science would have seemed natural outgrowths of philosophical epistemology. Whether this reflects growing modesty or a lamentable failure of commitment, few contemporary philosophers would undertake the radical reforming projects that animated ancient skeptics, early modern natural philosophers, or nineteenth-century Idealists. And fewer yet would countenance a theory of knowledge that abjured the collective beliefs of certain important, non-philosophical communities (except those of Twin Earth or strange swamps). To this extent then, most epistemologists today can be said to respect the common knowledge of some community.

Item Type

http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_efa0

Alternative

License

Other License Text / Link

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Language

en

Location

Time Period

Source