Black History Month is here! Discover ERA research focused on Black experiences in Canada and worldwide. Use our general search below to get started!

Sensitivity Analysis for Plane Orientation in Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis based on Superimposition of Serial CBCT Images

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Citation for Previous Publication

Lagravère, M., Carey, J., and Major, P. (2010). Sensitivity Analysis for Plane Orientation in Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis based on Superimposition of Serial CBCT Images. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 39(7), 400-408.

Link to Related Item

http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/17319459

Abstract

Description

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential errors associated with superimposition of serial cone beam CT (CBCT) images utilizing reference planes based on cranial base landmarks using a sensitivity analysis. Methods: CBCT images from 62 patients participating in a maxillary expansion clinical trial were analysed. The left and right auditory external meatus (AEM), dorsum foramen magnum (DFM) and the midpoint between the left and right foramen spinosum (ELSA) were used to define a three-dimensional (3D) anatomical reference co-ordinate system. Intraclass correlation coefficients for all four landmarks were obtained. Transformation of the reference system was carried out using the four landmarks and mathematical comparison of values. Results: Excellent intrareliability values for each dimension were obtained for each landmark. Evaluation of the method to transform the co-ordinate system was first done by comparing interlandmark distances before and after transformations, giving errors in lengths in the order of 10–14% (software rounding error). A sensitivity evaluation was performed by adding 0.25 mm, 0.5 mm and 1 mm error in one axis of the ELSA. A positioning error of 0.25 mm in the ELSA can produce up to 1.0 mm error in other cranial base landmark co-ordinates. These errors could be magnified to distant landmarks where in some cases menton and infraorbital landmarks were displaced 4–6 mm. Conclusions: Minor variations in location of the ELSA, both the AEM and the DFM landmarks produce large and potentially clinically significant uncertainty in co-ordinate system alignment.

Item Type

http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Alternative

License

Other License Text / Link

© 2010 Manuel O. Lagravère et al. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.

Language

en

Location

Time Period

Source