Non-restricted Winter 2026 convocation theses and dissertations will be discoverable in ERA on March 16. Congratulations to all our graduates!

Competitive size asymmetry, not intensity, is linked to species loss and gain in a native grassland community

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Citation for Previous Publication

Charlotte Brown & James Cahill (2022). Competitive size asymmetry, not intensity, is linked to species loss and gain in a native grassland community. Ecology e3675. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3675

Link to Related Item

https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3675

Abstract

Description

Competition is often highlighted as a major force influencing plant species diversity. However, there are multiple facets of competition (e.g., strength, intransitivity, and size asymmetry) that may have independent and differential impacts on diversity, making understanding the degree to which competition structures communities difficult. Unfortunately, field-based experiments that decouple multiple facets of competition are lacking, limiting our ability to test theoretical frameworks and reducing understanding of the actual linkages among competition and coexistence. Here, we experimentally manipulate the size structure of local grassland communities to examine the relative impacts of competitive size asymmetry (i.e., competitive advantage based on relative size) and intensity (i.e., mean effect of neighbors on plant growth) on species loss and gain. Increased competitive size asymmetry was associated with increased species loss and decreased species gain, while no relationship was found between competitive intensity and species loss and gain. Furthermore, the probability of loss was not dependent on a species initial size, suggesting that small species may not always be the losers of size-asymmetric interactions. Instead, loss was dependent on species rarity, where loss was higher for rare species. Overall, these results suggest that competitive size asymmetry may be more important for species loss than intensity in some plant communities and demonstrates the importance of decoupling different aspects of competition to better understand their drivers and ecological consequences.

Item Type

http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Alternative

License

Other License Text / Link

Copyright © 2022 by the Ecological Society of America. All rights reserved.

Language

en

Location

Time Period

Source