A new tool for measuring individual differences in conceptual structure

dc.contributor.advisorWestbury, Chris (Psychology)
dc.contributor.authorGagliardi, Emilio
dc.contributor.otherGagne, Christina (Psychology)
dc.contributor.otherMos, Leendert (Psychology, Linguistics)
dc.contributor.otherBoechler, Patricia (Educational Psychology)
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-29T01:45:42Z
dc.date.available2025-05-29T01:45:42Z
dc.date.issued2010-06
dc.description.abstractImplicit concept mapping (iCmap; Aidman & Egan, 1998), measures: (1) the complexity of conceptual activation, and (2) the degree to which integration is internally consistent. These characteristics describe aspects of both Dual Code theory (DCT; Paivio,1986) and of lexical meaning (Johnson-Laird, 1987). Within the DCT literature, two kinds of representations have been proposed, verbal and nonverbal, and in the case of concrete words both kinds of representations will be activated compared to abstract words, which only have a verbal representation. 40 Participants completed Experiment 1, which aimed to assess degree of conceptual change due to learning. The results revealed no change in performance. 120 Participants completed Experiment 2 with a modified task called, progressive concept mapping (proCmap). The results indicated that concrete nouns had greater consistency between trials relative to abstract nouns, whereas abstract nouns had greater complexity. These results provide confirmatory evidence that proCmap is sensitive to information associated with conceptual structure
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7939/R34M6K
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsThis thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for non-commercial purposes. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
dc.subjectConcept Mapping
dc.subjectCategories
dc.subjectTheory of Meaning
dc.subjectConcepts
dc.subjectConceptual Structure
dc.subjectDual Code Theory
dc.subjectMeaningful Learning
dc.titleA new tool for measuring individual differences in conceptual structure
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec
thesis.degree.grantorhttp://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79058482
thesis.degree.levelMaster's
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science
ual.date.graduationSpring 2010
ual.departmentDepartment of Psychology
ual.jupiterAccesshttp://terms.library.ualberta.ca/public

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gagliardi_Emilio_Spring-202010.pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format