Measuring Conscious Monitoring and Metacognition of Motor Performance at the Start, Middle, and End of a Reaching Movement

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Institution

http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79058482

Degree Level

Master's

Degree

Master of Science

Department

Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation

Supervisor / Co-Supervisor and Their Department(s)

Citation for Previous Publication

Link to Related Item

Abstract

The ability to monitor our arm position during goal-directed behaviour allows us to bring our limb to a target as accurately as possible. Despite our success in executing accurate movements, some work suggests that individuals have limited access to information about their limb position (Fourneret & Jeannerod, 1998; Pélisson, et al., 1986). However, contradictory evidence from metacognition research indicates that people have some access to details about their movements. In these studies, individuals are asked to rate their confidence after making judgements about their movements and tend to give higher confidence ratings when they are correct, showing some capacity for self-monitoring (Arbuzova et al., 2021). These conflicting results suggest that we may not be monitoring an entire movement from start to end. In the current study, participants (n=50) made reaching movements toward targets on a screen. They were then presented with two movement paths: one being their actual trajectory and the other being a visually deviated version. Here, we manipulated the location that the deviation was implemented (i.e., start, middle, or end of the path). Participants were then asked to determine which trajectory was their own, while also rating their confidence in their response. Overall, accuracy was lower than expected. Nevertheless, accuracy was significantly lower when deviations occurred at the start of the reach, indicating that awareness of limb position is further reduced at the start of a movement. Additionally, participants showed some ability to metacognitively monitor their movements because their confidence scaled with their accuracy in the task. Finally, differences in metacognitive processes between locations were found, with higher average confidence in the middle of a movement when accuracy was held constant. We conclude that people have a remarkable blindness to the properties of their own movements, while still having a “feel” of their performance. As well, poor awareness of limb position at the start of a movement suggests reduced attention to the limb at this time, possibly due to movement programming demands.

Item Type

http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec

Alternative

License

Other License Text / Link

This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Library with permission of the copyright owner solely for non-commercial purposes. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.

Language

en

Location

Time Period

Source