Overlapping remedies and the unexpected termination of oil and gas leases
Loading...
Date
Author(s)
Citation for Previous Publication
Percy, D., & McGillivray, D. (2011). Overlapping remedies and the unexpected termination of oil and gas leases. Alberta Law Review, 49(2), 251-276. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/alblr49&div=16&g_sent=1&collection=journals
Link to Related Item
http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/alblr49&div=16&g_sent=1&collection=journals
Abstract
Description
The freehold oil and gas lease in Canada has had a perilous and uncertain existence. In the early cases, the courts applieda literal interpretation ofthe leases, resulting in numerous unexpectedly terminated leases. In recent years, there has been a resurgence of cases involving terminated leases. Modern case law recognizes that the failure of a lease can create liabilities in both tort and restitution, but courts have faced difficulties in dealing with the overlapping compensatory and restitutionary remedies. The modern case law has been heavily criticized, but the authors argue that there is a smaller difference between the overlapping remedies than is commonly supposed when the underlying purpose of restitutionary remedies is examined, and they propose a resolution to the problem of overlapping remedies.
Item Type
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
Alternative
License
Other License Text / Link
© 2011 David R. Percy et al. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.
Subject/Keywords
Language
en