Health profession regulators: A Case Study on the BC College of Nurses and Midwives
| dc.contributor.author | Elizabeth Bruce | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-01T01:49:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-01T01:49:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-06-01 | |
| dc.description | The role of professional health regulators and how they resolve complaints against practitioners has been examined and studied in many jurisdictions in the west. Much of the research has focused on the impact the complaint process has on disciplined professionals and complainants. This research has not included researching into how the public awareness of regulatory college and how their understanding of regulatory colleges informs the public’s expectations on how complaints can and should be resolved. In the context of a Canadian province’s nursing regulatory body, this research attempts to understand the public’s awareness of the BC College of Nurses and Midwives (BCCNM), capture their perspectives on the standard complaint process, and gauge their support for an alternative dispute resolution process. This study focuses on BCCNM’s current complaint resolution process and explores an alternative dispute resolution process that is administered at the College of Nurses of Ontario. The study uses one-on-one interviews and a focus group to collect the data. By using these two qualitative methods, this study collects data on the participants’ awareness of BCCNM, their understanding and expectations of a standards complaint process, and their perspectives and receptiveness to an alternative complaints process. The findings from this study reveal the participants have some awareness of BCCNM and general understanding of health profession regulators. Their expectations for complaint outcomes did not fully align with the college’s mandate and regulatory right-touch philosophy. The participants’ supported the alternative dispute resolution process but raised concerns about transparency and future public protection. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.7939/r3-j78x-kw17 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Health professional regulation | |
| dc.subject | regulatory colleges | |
| dc.subject | public awareness | |
| dc.subject | transparency | |
| dc.subject | alternative dispute resolution | |
| dc.subject | complaints process | |
| dc.subject | complaints | |
| dc.subject | public complaints | |
| dc.subject | nurses | |
| dc.subject | discipline | |
| dc.subject | right-touch regulation | |
| dc.title | Health profession regulators: A Case Study on the BC College of Nurses and Midwives | |
| dc.type | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843 | |
| ual.jupiterAccess | http://terms.library.ualberta.ca/public |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Capstone_Elizabeth_Bruce.pdf
- Size:
- 3.96 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
