Fall 2025 theses and dissertations (non-restricted) will be available in ERA on November 17, 2025.

Hydraulic consequences of vessel evolution in angiosperms

dc.contributor.authorHacke, Uwe G.
dc.contributor.authorFeild, Taylor S.
dc.contributor.authorSano, Yuzuo
dc.contributor.authorSperry, John S.
dc.contributor.authorSikkema, Elzard H.
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-01T12:29:16Z
dc.date.available2025-05-01T12:29:16Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.descriptionWe tested two hypotheses for how vessel evolution in angiosperms influenced xylem function. First, the transition to vessels decreased resistance to flow—often considered the driving force for their evolution. Second, the transition to vessels compromised safety from cavitation—a constraint emerging from the “pit area hypothesis” for vulnerability to cavitation. Data were obtained from branch wood of 17 basal taxa with vessels and two eudicots possessing “primitive” perforation plates. Results were compared with previous data from vesselless angiosperms and eudicots with simple perforation plates. Contrary to the first hypothesis, basal taxa did not have significantly lower sapwood‐specific resistivity than vesselless angiosperms, despite vessels being wider than tracheids. Eudicot resistivity was ca. 4.5 times lower. On a vessel‐area basis, resistivity of “primitive” vessels ($435\pm 104$ MPa s m−2) was lower than angiosperm tracheids ($906\pm 89$ MPa s m−2) but still greater than eudicot vessels ($91\pm 9$ MPa s m−2). High resistivity of primitive vessels could be attributed to their being shorter per diameter than eudicots and to high perforation plate resistivity ($57\% \pm 15\% $ of total) in the species with scalariform plates. In support of the second hypothesis, primitive vessels had a cavitation pressure 1.4 MPa more vulnerable than angiosperm tracheids. This “vulnerability bottleneck” may have been even more extreme without a shift in vessels to less porous interconduit pit membranes. Vessel evolution was not driven by lower flow resistance, and it may have been limited to wet habitats by cavitation risk. A subtle, context‐dependent advantage to primitive vessels is consistent with the distribution of the vesselless condition in the angiosperm tree. The results imply that truly efficient and safe vessels evolved much later than vessels per se, perhaps in concordance with larger radiations among core angiosperms.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7939/R3HX1654V
dc.language.isoen
dc.relationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086/520726
dc.relation.isversionofSperry, J., Hacke, U., Feild, ., Sano, Y., and Sikkema, E. (2007). Hydraulic consequences of vessel evolution in angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 168(8), 1127-1139.
dc.rights2007 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectVessel
dc.subjectBasal Angiosperm Physiology
dc.subjectWater Transport
dc.subjectXylem Cavitation
dc.subjectXylem Evolution
dc.subjectEcological Wood Anatomy
dc.titleHydraulic consequences of vessel evolution in angiosperms
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ual.jupiterAccesshttp://terms.library.ualberta.ca/public

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IJPs_168_8_1127_38e4df7f-41ff-46d1-b93b-3a8f0f966205.pdf
Size:
873.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format